“The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe,” Timothy D. Brute force attacks are usually carried out with the assistance of a powerful computer, which can automatically input millions of different password combinations until it guesses the correct one.Ĭan Apple comply with the order if it wants to?Īpple’s opposition is mostly ideological. In electronic security parlance, that is what is called a “brute force” attack, and all it takes is time and patience to submit a large number of passcodes. It would allow the government to try an unlimited number of passwords without fear of the phone erasing all of its stored information. Technically, that would not require Apple to decrypt the passcode that blocks access by outsiders to the iPhone. Lyft: The ride-hailing company, long in Uber’s shadow, has been thrust into the spotlight as its financial woes have set off speculation over whether it could be an acquisition target.YouTube: Susan Wojcicki, YouTube’s chief executive and one of the most prominent women in Silicon Valley, is stepping down from her longtime role leading the internet’s most popular video service.The move comes after Bing offered an array of inaccurate and at times bizarre responses to some users. Bing: Microsoft will start limiting the length of conversations with the new chatbot in its search engine.Meta: The parent company of Facebook and Instagram wants users to start paying $11.99 a month for verified blue check marks and other features, taking a page out of Twitter’s playbook.Apple claims this software can give someone “the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.” wants Apple to circumvent.Apple would have to build a new version of its iOS smartphone software that allows the F.B.I. The iPhone, a 5c version of the smartphone that was released in 2013, is locked by a passcode, which the F.B.I. The Federal Bureau of Investigation wants to examine the iPhone used by Syed Farook to determine whether he and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, had planned the shooting directly with the Islamic State. In the hours after Apple’s letter was published, technologists and legal experts have been dissecting what, exactly, the Cupertino, Calif., company can’t - or won’t - do to help the government. While technology companies recently have resisted government demands, Apple’s letter is one of the industry’s most forceful pushbacks against a court ruling. Wednesday morning, Apple said in a strongly worded letter that it would challenge the court’s request. unlock an iPhone used by one of the attackers who killed 14 people in San Bernardino, Calif., in December. Tuesday evening, a federal court ordered Apple to help the F.B.I.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |